abc you must be brain less if you want to ride standing up. First rule during a plane crash is to fold your body into a ball shape. How do you expecet there to be any survivors on a standing room flight? If you are blind enough to see that this is only for more profits for the airline companies then you need some glasses.
Why would we want more seats when the planes are not even flying at full capacity during this global crisis?

Going in a plane is whole lot safer than going by road. I'm sure the design boys have figured out that with good vertical support I'm really safe - no wiplash for example.
Its stupid more than one airline goes from one place to another - with each airline having a share in an A380 there could be a an AA section, A Delta section etc.
This wold save GHG. Or airlines could compete to fly a route.
In the US the present system is stupid and wasteful. Less seats in more efficient, larger aircraft is the answer.
S.

planes are safe? what happened to air france? What happenes when the plane has to apply the brake at full force? The passengers will die
that will create a monopoly and prices will go out of control. The point of more airlines going to the same place is competition. Also, many airlines are going with the smaller fuel efficient planes. A380 is a gas guzzler and is only good for long flights. For interstate flights the smaller planes are good

Trains are good for interstate travel. Up to 400 miles. Upright supports will remain in place and passengers will be safe. A380 uses 40% less fuel per passenger mile than a 747. No need for a monopoly Airlines can bid to run the service to the government - very much as they do for military flights and also airlines can bid for blocks of seats to sell and service. Very much free market,
But reduced ATC costs, less delays through fewer aircraft flying, more comfort in an A380, more fuel efficiency, better choice - maybe 6 airlines on one A380 each using 100 seats.
S.

S.
S.

[/QUOTE]
Trains are good for interstate travel. Up to 400 miles. Upright supports will remain in place and passengers will be safe. A380 uses 40% less fuel per passenger mile than a 747. No need for a monopoly Airlines can bid to run the service to the government - very much as they do for military flights and also airlines can bid for blocks of seats to sell and service. Very much free market,
But reduced ATC costs, less delays through fewer aircraft flying, more comfort in an A380, more fuel efficiency, better choice - maybe 6 airlines on one A380 each using 100 seats.
S.

S.
S.
[/QUOTE]
people will break their feet on hard landings.

[QUOTE=xwill7]

[/QUOTE]
Trains are good for interstate travel. Up to 400 miles. Upright supports will remain in place and passengers will be safe. A380 uses 40% less fuel per passenger mile than a 747. No need for a monopoly Airlines can bid to run the service to the government - very much as they do for military flights and also airlines can bid for blocks of seats to sell and service. Very much free market,
But reduced ATC costs, less delays through fewer aircraft flying, more comfort in an A380, more fuel efficiency, better choice - maybe 6 airlines on one A380 each using 100 seats.
S.

S.
S.
[/QUOTE]
people will break their feet on hard landings.
[/QUOTE]
Not with straps to hang onto - but just imagine with half the number of planes flying flights could be on-time and cheaper. Airlines will make big profits.
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/asia/singapore/2009/09/09/223956/Singapore-flyers.htm
S.

[QUOTE=abc200]
[QUOTE=xwill7]

[/QUOTE]
Trains are good for interstate travel. Up to 400 miles. Upright supports will remain in place and passengers will be safe. A380 uses 40% less fuel per passenger mile than a 747. No need for a monopoly Airlines can bid to run the service to the government - very much as they do for military flights and also airlines can bid for blocks of seats to sell and service. Very much free market,
But reduced ATC costs, less delays through fewer aircraft flying, more comfort in an A380, more fuel efficiency, better choice - maybe 6 airlines on one A380 each using 100 seats.
S.

S.
S.
[/QUOTE]
people will break their feet on hard landings.
[/QUOTE]
Not with straps to hang onto - but just imagine with half the number of planes flying flights could be on-time and cheaper. Airlines will make big profits.
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/asia/singapore/2009/09/09/223956/Singapore-flyers.htm
S.

[/QUOTE]
how will straps to hang on to help from breaking ankles??? A hard landing needs a soft seat cushion to absorb the impact

I am for air dominicana only is an American company buys it and makes sure the planes have proper repairs