Lima.– With four-digit inflation and violent Maoist
guerrillas, Peru for many years was hardly the place for a seaweed wrap in a
swank hotel.
But nowadays, relative peace and a booming economy draw
boutique travelers to the Andean terrain and ancient ruins that were previously
the domain of brave, budget-conscious backpackers.
Celebrity tourists Bill Gates and Cameron Diaz both recently
visited Machu Picchu, where $965 a night gets you a room with a view of the
famous Inca citadel. In nearby Cuzco, elevation 11,500 feet, you can
have extra oxygen pumped into your room for $30 a night.
Yet as free-market President Alan Garcia speeds the
development of Peru's high-end tourism sector, he is sparking a standoff with
local residents who say they won't benefit from the boom. Earlier this year,
protesters shut Cuzco's airport and blocked the only rail line to Machu Picchu
to make their point.
"Cuzco no se vende!" they shouted in
demonstrations: "Cuzco is not for sale!"
It is a longtime paradox in Peru, where the economy expanded
9 percent in 2007 for the ninth year in a row. But poverty persists, especially
in many of the highland tourist destinations, affecting some 44 percent of the
27 million population.
The government touts tourism as a job-generator. But most
protesters don't work in the industry and are more focused on the need for good
education and health care –things they say a few dozen more waiter and bellhop
jobs won't fix.
"Most of the Cuzco area lives off of agriculture,"
said Gonzalo Valderrama, 30, a
local anthropologist who joined the protests. "Just because there is more
tourism investment, it does not necessarily benefit those who live in the
surrounding state."
Tourist entries at Lima's Jorge Chavez International Airport
increased from 998,000 in
2002 to more than 1.8 million last year, according to Peru's Foreign Trade and
Tourism Ministry, thanks in part to an award-winning publicity campaign
launched two years ago.
Some 160,000 of them spent at least $1,000 a day, said
Tibisay Monsalve, general manager of the Hotel Association of Peru.
Visits to Machu Picchu, Peru's top tourist destination, have
more than doubled in the last decade to 800,000 people –along with the price
of getting there.
Cuzco now has a half-dozen four- and five-star hotels. That
compares with two in the early 1990s, when the city was a haven for daring
travelers defying U.S. State Department warnings against the bloody Shining
Path insurgency.
Peru's picturesque highlands were the epicenter of a dirty
war between the military and leftist guerrillas that killed almost 70,000
people between 1980 and 2000.
Written by: josean, 20 Apr 2008 8:26 AM
From: United States
I guess the model placing tourism as center piece of development is not very effective at addressing structural poverty in Peru or DR.
"It is a longtime paradox in Peru, where the economy expanded 9 percent in 2007 for the ninth year in a row. But poverty persists, especially in many of the highland tourist destinations, affecting some 44 percent of the 27 million population."
"Just because there is more tourism investment, it does not necessarily benefit those who live in the surrounding state."
These statements could almost be used verbatim to describe what is happening in DR.
The question is not just increasing growth but rather increasing the benefits that growth represents to the entire community.
Written by: Belial, 20 Apr 2008 1:40 PM
From: United States, Texas
p.1
"It is a longtime paradox in Peru, where the economy expanded 9 percent in 2007 for the ninth year in a row," the DT reports."
Paradox arises from false propaganda emitted from the Peruvian bourgeoisie.
Consider the CIA view.
"After several years of inconsistent economic performance, the Peruvian economy grew by more than 4% per year during the period 2002-06, with a stable exchange rate and low inflation. Growth jumped to 7.5% in 2007, driven by higher world prices for minerals and metals."
https://www.cia.gov/library/publi....-world-factbook/geos/pe.html#EconThe CIA says that during five of the so-called 9-year period, growth averaged around 4%, not 9%. In 2007, the CIA says growth was less than 8%, not the 9%.
The CIA says the growth was driven by "higher world prices for minerals and metals" or commodity prices chiefly copper, gold, zinc, not so much the upscale tourism.
con't
Written by: Belial, 20 Apr 2008 1:41 PM
From: United States, Texas
p. 2
The imperialist mining companies in Peru pay slave wages to the workers and pay millions of dollars to the capitalists executives, mostly foreigners. These mining companies irreparably destroy the Peruvian environment. They deepen and spread the extreme poverty of the Peruvian people.
This so-called "paradox" is typically transparent reality of Imperialism.
Written by: Escott, 20 Apr 2008 7:46 PM
From: Dominican Republic, Sosua/Cabrera
Belial who is an expert on everything knows everything. AMAZING
Written by: josean, 21 Apr 2008 7:13 AM
From: United States
Written by: josean, 21 Apr 2008 5:32 PM
From: United States
And as Paul Harvey would say "You’ve heard the news now here is the rest of the story!"
Source DR1
Tourism not reaching the poor
Miguel Ceara-Hatton, of the United Nations Development Program and coordinator of the Human Development reports for the DR, highlighted the fact that the DR has many challenges ahead if tourism is to translate into progress for the poor of the Dominican Republic. He said that new data that is just becoming available because of in-depth research into development indicators at municipal level has made it possible to compare national indicators with indicators in the leading tourism areas, Puerto Plata and La Altagracia (Punta Cana). He says that the findings show that human development indicators lag behind in these two provinces, which are home to the largest concentration of hotel rooms.
Continued:
Written by: josean, 21 Apr 2008 5:33 PM
From: United States
Speaking at a presentation during the "All Under the Same Roof" Workshop sponsored by the Dominican Sustainable Tourism Alliance (USDSTA) in Santiago, Ceara-Hatton pointed out that while the average income for La Altagracia is 17% above the national average, the province lags considerably behind the average when it comes to the number of poor people, average years of education, number of high school graduates, adult illiteracy, and high school education of head of family indicators.
Furthermore, Ceara-Hatton commented that social tension could be generated because there is an increasing trend towards the privatization of beaches by hotels and luxury residential communities. He said that a better option would be the Blue Flag Certification, a program that calls for management of beaches and ensures quality of the beach but requires that beaches remain public.
Continued:
Written by: josean, 21 Apr 2008 5:34 PM
From: United States
He also pointed out that we are already feeling the impact of tourism on the environment, and mentioned how damage caused by hurricanes and tropical storms can be attributed in great part to the inadequate handling of water resources, hotels built on wetlands, destroyed mangroves and interruptions of the natural flow of water. He questioned the "inexhaustible" slogan of the Ministry of Tourism.
"It is not enough to grow, to increase foreign exchange income, to increase the number of visitors or increase the number of rooms", he stressed. "All that can happen while the population gets poorer, the environment is destroyed, our values are destroyed, there is more inequality of income, and people's living conditions deteriorate", he added, and pointed out that this is borne out by the statistics for Puerto Plata and La Altagracia provinces.
Continued:
Written by: josean, 21 Apr 2008 5:35 PM
From: United States
"Tourism is an opportunity for development only if it incorporates the people as direct beneficiaries, if it promotes culture, creates internal linkages, increases value added, respects culture and the environment and integrates communities", he concluded. "Otherwise, we will be building an excluded society, that is hostile, fragmented and with greater propensity for conflict" Ceara-Hatton explained that most Haitians living in these areas were not polled, and that if they had been taken into consideration the spread between those benefiting from tourism and those who are not would be much wider.
But I guess the objective truth from a UN rep. is just more Josean type "negativity!"
Pardon the pun, but you "Lie-onel" Fernandez and PLD apologists should get your "HEADS OUT OF THE SAND!"
From: United States
Josean, don't let anyone on here through you of course. You see things alot clearer then most people on here do. It's refreshing for me to read some of your posts. I've been saying for a long time that the economic model the DR is following is all smoke and mirrors as far as the bulk of the people are concerned.
BTW, WTF is dread?
Written by: josean, 22 Apr 2008 3:58 PM
From: United States
cibaeño75
Thank you for your very generous comments that I do not deserve but that I truly appreciate!
My objective in my posts is to cut through the "yellow mustard" and try to think out of the box.
Unfortunately in the "us versus them" political tradition of our culture, where if your opinion is not in lockstep with mine, or the person /or party I support, you obviously must be for the one I am against, that reality is a serious obstacle for non partisan debate. However, we must always be willing to present facts and let the chips fall where they may!
I think dread hit a MILLION dollar lottery and is on vacation on the French Riviera!
Seriously, I have been missing is excellent posts as well, I hope he is ok!
Written by: DennisC, 24 Apr 2008 6:14 PM
From: United States
Josean, you said it right, most Haitians living in these areas were not polled, but this is about Dominican Republic, not Haiti, and the party you support, who cares for that??, you are not Dominican, you cannot be, besides, you do not live in the real world,
Written by: josean, 25 Apr 2008 3:51 PM
From: United States
DennisC
Please review my post very carefully.
The quote you attribute to me "most Haitians living in these areas were not polled" is from an article at DR1 attributed to Miguel Ceara-Hatton, of the United Nations Development Program and coordinator of the Human Development reports for the DR, not mine.
Could you please, if you would be so kind, explain to me how you have arrived at this conclusion "you are not Dominican, you cannot be?"
Is it because I don’t hate Haitians, or because I do not join in the lets blame the Haitians for all our problems mantra, or is it that the litmus test to prove you are Dominican is to show your superiority by seeing how much venomous rhetoric you can post here against other human beings who happened to be less fortunate at the moment than us?
Respectfully, please let me know when and why I stopped being Dominican!
Written by: DennisC, 25 Apr 2008 6:10 PM
From: United States
my dear friend Josean, I have seen and read what you write in every single article that have to do with our country, and believe me, any answers to you would be all futile, you are a lost cause as far as I am concerned. Whether you are Dominican, Haitian, Siberian, is irrelevant.
Written by: josean, 25 Apr 2008 7:45 PM
From: United States
DennisC
So you would agree that you comments about my nationality fall into, Fallacy: Circumstantial Ad Hominem
Description of Circumstantial Ad Hominem
A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy in which one attempts to attack a claim by asserting that the person making the claim is making it simply out of self interest. In some cases, this fallacy involves substituting an attack on a person's circumstances (such as the person's religion, political affiliation, ethnic background, etc.). The fallacy has the following forms:
Person A makes claim X.
Person B asserts that A makes claim X because it is in A's interest to claim X.
Therefore claim X is false.
Person A makes claim X.
Person B makes an attack on A's circumstances.
Therefore X is false.
A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy because a person's interests and circumstances have no bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made.
Continued:
Written by: josean, 25 Apr 2008 7:47 PM
From: United States
While a person's interests will provide them with motives to support certain claims, the claims stand or fall on their own. It is also the case that a person's circumstances (religion, political affiliation, etc.) do not affect the truth or falsity of the claim. This is made quite clear by the following example: "Bill claims that 1+1=2. But he is a Republican, so his claim is false."
There are times when it is prudent to suspicious of a person's claims, such as when it is evident that the claims are being biased by the person's interests. For example, if a tobacco company representative claims that tobacco does not cause cancer, it would be prudent to not simply accept the claim. This is because the person has a motivation to make the claim, whether it is true or not. However, the mere fact that the person has a motivation to make the claim does not make it false. For example, suppose a parent tells her son that sticking a fork in a light socket would be dangerous.
Continued:
Written by: josean, 25 Apr 2008 7:48 PM
From: United States
Simply because she has a motivation to say this obviously does not make her claim false.
Examples of Circumstantial Ad Hominem
"She asserts that we need more military spending, but that is false, since she is only saying it because she is a Republican."
"I think that we should reject what Father Jones has to say about the ethical issues of abortion because he is a Catholic priest. After all, Father Jones is required to hold such views."
"Of course the Senator from Maine opposes a reduction in naval spending. After all, Bath Ironworks, which produces warships, is in Maine."
"Bill claims that tax breaks for corporations increases development. Of course, Bill is the CEO of a corporation."
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fa....es/circumstantial-ad-hominem.htmlWritten by: Perez, 10 May 2008 9:05 PM
From: Dominican Republic
Josean, I so agree with you. perhaps tourism plays part of the economy in DR but i don't see people profiting from it. It is incredible i admire the residents from the cuzco region, because they have the galls to defend themselves from such situation. People seem to forget that DR also rely on agriculture as well. Honestly we shouldn't rely on tourism too much because it attracts some unwanted attention or moguls. You know what they say, too much is not good
"It is a longtime paradox in Peru, where the economy expanded 9 percent in 2007 for the ninth year in a row. But poverty persists, especially in many of the highland tourist destinations, affecting some 44 percent of the 27 million population."
"Just because there is more tourism investment, it does not necessarily benefit those who live in the surrounding state."
These statements could almost be used verbatim to describe what is happening in DR.
The question is not just increasing growth but rather increasing the benefits that growth represents to the entire community.
"It is a longtime paradox in Peru, where the economy expanded 9 percent in 2007 for the ninth year in a row," the DT reports."
Paradox arises from false propaganda emitted from the Peruvian bourgeoisie.
Consider the CIA view.
"After several years of inconsistent economic performance, the Peruvian economy grew by more than 4% per year during the period 2002-06, with a stable exchange rate and low inflation. Growth jumped to 7.5% in 2007, driven by higher world prices for minerals and metals."
https://www.cia.gov/library/publi....-world-factbook/geos/pe.html#Econ
The CIA says that during five of the so-called 9-year period, growth averaged around 4%, not 9%. In 2007, the CIA says growth was less than 8%, not the 9%.
The CIA says the growth was driven by "higher world prices for minerals and metals" or commodity prices chiefly copper, gold, zinc, not so much the upscale tourism.
con't
The imperialist mining companies in Peru pay slave wages to the workers and pay millions of dollars to the capitalists executives, mostly foreigners. These mining companies irreparably destroy the Peruvian environment. They deepen and spread the extreme poverty of the Peruvian people.
This so-called "paradox" is typically transparent reality of Imperialism.
Read on:
http://www.listin.com.do/app/article.aspx?id=55902
Source DR1
Tourism not reaching the poor
Miguel Ceara-Hatton, of the United Nations Development Program and coordinator of the Human Development reports for the DR, highlighted the fact that the DR has many challenges ahead if tourism is to translate into progress for the poor of the Dominican Republic. He said that new data that is just becoming available because of in-depth research into development indicators at municipal level has made it possible to compare national indicators with indicators in the leading tourism areas, Puerto Plata and La Altagracia (Punta Cana). He says that the findings show that human development indicators lag behind in these two provinces, which are home to the largest concentration of hotel rooms.
Continued:
Speaking at a presentation during the "All Under the Same Roof" Workshop sponsored by the Dominican Sustainable Tourism Alliance (USDSTA) in Santiago, Ceara-Hatton pointed out that while the average income for La Altagracia is 17% above the national average, the province lags considerably behind the average when it comes to the number of poor people, average years of education, number of high school graduates, adult illiteracy, and high school education of head of family indicators.
Furthermore, Ceara-Hatton commented that social tension could be generated because there is an increasing trend towards the privatization of beaches by hotels and luxury residential communities. He said that a better option would be the Blue Flag Certification, a program that calls for management of beaches and ensures quality of the beach but requires that beaches remain public.
Continued:
He also pointed out that we are already feeling the impact of tourism on the environment, and mentioned how damage caused by hurricanes and tropical storms can be attributed in great part to the inadequate handling of water resources, hotels built on wetlands, destroyed mangroves and interruptions of the natural flow of water. He questioned the "inexhaustible" slogan of the Ministry of Tourism.
"It is not enough to grow, to increase foreign exchange income, to increase the number of visitors or increase the number of rooms", he stressed. "All that can happen while the population gets poorer, the environment is destroyed, our values are destroyed, there is more inequality of income, and people's living conditions deteriorate", he added, and pointed out that this is borne out by the statistics for Puerto Plata and La Altagracia provinces.
Continued:
But I guess the objective truth from a UN rep. is just more Josean type "negativity!"
Pardon the pun, but you "Lie-onel" Fernandez and PLD apologists should get your "HEADS OUT OF THE SAND!"
BTW, WTF is dread?
Thank you for your very generous comments that I do not deserve but that I truly appreciate!
My objective in my posts is to cut through the "yellow mustard" and try to think out of the box.
Unfortunately in the "us versus them" political tradition of our culture, where if your opinion is not in lockstep with mine, or the person /or party I support, you obviously must be for the one I am against, that reality is a serious obstacle for non partisan debate. However, we must always be willing to present facts and let the chips fall where they may!
I think dread hit a MILLION dollar lottery and is on vacation on the French Riviera!
Seriously, I have been missing is excellent posts as well, I hope he is ok!
Please review my post very carefully.
The quote you attribute to me "most Haitians living in these areas were not polled" is from an article at DR1 attributed to Miguel Ceara-Hatton, of the United Nations Development Program and coordinator of the Human Development reports for the DR, not mine.
Could you please, if you would be so kind, explain to me how you have arrived at this conclusion "you are not Dominican, you cannot be?"
Is it because I don’t hate Haitians, or because I do not join in the lets blame the Haitians for all our problems mantra, or is it that the litmus test to prove you are Dominican is to show your superiority by seeing how much venomous rhetoric you can post here against other human beings who happened to be less fortunate at the moment than us?
Respectfully, please let me know when and why I stopped being Dominican!
So you would agree that you comments about my nationality fall into, Fallacy: Circumstantial Ad Hominem
Description of Circumstantial Ad Hominem
A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy in which one attempts to attack a claim by asserting that the person making the claim is making it simply out of self interest. In some cases, this fallacy involves substituting an attack on a person's circumstances (such as the person's religion, political affiliation, ethnic background, etc.). The fallacy has the following forms:
Person A makes claim X.
Person B asserts that A makes claim X because it is in A's interest to claim X.
Therefore claim X is false.
Person A makes claim X.
Person B makes an attack on A's circumstances.
Therefore X is false.
A Circumstantial ad Hominem is a fallacy because a person's interests and circumstances have no bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made.
Continued:
There are times when it is prudent to suspicious of a person's claims, such as when it is evident that the claims are being biased by the person's interests. For example, if a tobacco company representative claims that tobacco does not cause cancer, it would be prudent to not simply accept the claim. This is because the person has a motivation to make the claim, whether it is true or not. However, the mere fact that the person has a motivation to make the claim does not make it false. For example, suppose a parent tells her son that sticking a fork in a light socket would be dangerous.
Continued:
Examples of Circumstantial Ad Hominem
"She asserts that we need more military spending, but that is false, since she is only saying it because she is a Republican."
"I think that we should reject what Father Jones has to say about the ethical issues of abortion because he is a Catholic priest. After all, Father Jones is required to hold such views."
"Of course the Senator from Maine opposes a reduction in naval spending. After all, Bath Ironworks, which produces warships, is in Maine."
"Bill claims that tax breaks for corporations increases development. Of course, Bill is the CEO of a corporation."
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fa....es/circumstantial-ad-hominem.html