SANTO DOMINGO.- The Civil Aviation Board (JAC) said it’s concerned with the intention of some foreign commercial airlines to charge passengers additional fees for luggage.
The JAC said any additional fees must be submitted for it to weigh and decide on.
In a missive to the Airlines Association, Civil Aviation Board president Luis Rodriguez Ariza said his agency is concerned with reports that some foreign carriers are set to charge additional fees for luggage.
He said the JAC’s mainly responsibility is to establish and regulate air transport policies.

Hasen't he (president Luis Rodriguez Ariza) noticed that Spirit has been doing this since last year.
Lets pull in some more votes for the PLD and its bright cronnies like Segura at the CDE.
What train did these people get off of to come up with these idiotic statements.
Check it now as it is substantially less and they charge outragous fees for extra weight that wasn't before.
* Only bags up to 50 lbs/23 kgs or less will be accepted completely free of charge as part of the two checked bags allowance.
* Bags over 50 lbs/23 kgs but less than 70 lbs/32 kgs can also be checked-in as part of the two bags allowance but will be subject to a $50 USD overweight baggage fee per bag.
* Bags over 70 lbs/32 kgs cannot be accepted....plus one carry on
Foreign airlies are governed by the ICAO and that is limited to operations only, not to any restrictions placed on their passengers or anything pertaining to restrictions placed on luggage limits of number of peices or weight.
The threat of the JAC iswithout force or authority andthat's the bottom line.
This is nothing but empty rhetoric on the part of and agency totally without the power to act effectively, especially in the manner proposed.
Such statements are nothing but "Machismo eyewash" for public consumption.
TB
You know, they have been blaming it on the rise of fuel cost for the last decade or more, and yet in the off season, the ticket prices come down while the fuel cost stays the same...go figure.
Just don't be surprised if you get laughed out of their headquarters.
These guys are forever trying to figure out how to increase thier "bottom line" in theface of extreme adversity.
Personally, I think they should be placed back under the regulatory scenario that existed a few years back. They have entirely too many flights as it is and are overtaxing the Air Route Traffic Control System by jamming too many aircraft into too many transportation hubs causing unwarranted delays and extra costs to themselves asa result.
TB